The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs depict the trends for percentage of households with electrical equipment and average weekly hours spent on chores in one country over the period of 100 years.
It is clear that the proportion of households with electrical appliances rose considerably between 1920 and 2019, and refrigerator saw the most dramatic increase in that period. By contrast, the number of hours of housework fell significantly over the same timescale as a result.
In the year 1920, the percentage of washing machine and vacuum cleaner was 40% and 30% respectively, while the number of houses with refrigerator stood at approximately 0%. Over the following 40 years, however, the figure for the electrical equipment rose quickly to 90% and overtook those for washing machine and vacuum cleaner, with the same proportion of 70%. The figures for two types of tool increased gradually in the later period and reached to 100% in 1980 for refrigerator and 1990 for vacuum cleaner. The number of washing machine used in households fell slightly in 1980 and stood at nearly 75% in the end of period.
Looking at the average weekly hours that household spent on chores, there was a dramatic decrease can be seen between 1920 and 1960. In 1920, the figure was 50 hours but fell to 20 hours over the 40-year period, and finally down to just over 10 hours in 2019.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a honey bee 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly over the same timescale as a result. In the year 1920, the percentage of wash...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89956331878 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66696063164 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515283842795 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3400665673 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120126127968 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599704268743 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543075820237 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974966940586 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470739081446 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.