The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019

The two line graphs illustrate the proportion of households that have electrical devices and the number of hours spent on doing housework every week per household in a given country from 1920 to 2019. Overall, it is clear that the percentage of all owned electrical appliances followed an upward trend, in particular refrigerators and vacuum cleaners. The total time spent doing housework also declined dramatically during the given period.

The proportion of families having refrigerators experienced the most significant increase, growing abruptly with less than 1% to more than 50% by 1950, and then continuing to rise steadily and remain stable at 100% from 1980 until the end of period. The figure for vacuum cleaners rose by exactly 20% every 20 years until 1960, then it reached 100% by 1980. In contrast, the percentage of houses that possess washing machines began at 40%, climbed to 70% by 1960, then fell slightly, and recovered to finish the period at just above 70%.

The number of hours spent on doing housework such as washing clothes, preparing meals, and cleaning fell sharply by 30 hours from 1920 to 1960. After that, the decline was more gradual, reaching slightly more than 10 hours by 2019.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...100% from 1980 until the end of period. The figure for vacuum cleaners rose by exac...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, in contrast, in particular, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06467661692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60202334387 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626865671642 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4460884911 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181099793537 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824567200121 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928501257541 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135825605354 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124732473688 0.0819641961636 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.