The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram interrupts some of the developed transformations of the cinema from 1980 to 2021.
Overall, we can see exactly that in the first picture the cinema now is more convenient for people's demands while the cinema in 1980 is deserted.
Primarily, despite of several changes, the cinema has had some things that have been used until now. The toilet for male and female have been remained like in 1980. The cinema 1 and cinema 2 have been used. The place where tickets are sell and the canteens have not been removed.
In contrast, there are many developments of the cinema nowadays. Firstly, the car park has been destroyed and a cinema 2 has been moved to its site. Secondly, the food drinks has been moved to another place where the cinema 1 uses to be there. Furthermore, a new room has been built next to the canteen is relax room. A new DVD shop has also built next to the ticket shop. There more cinemas have been constructed and they are located in front of the DVD shop.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Anne020304 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | hien3112 | 82 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | hien3112 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | lalo | 11 | view |
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 61
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as maintained next to the entering place
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74838709677 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3516460903 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.303482582 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.9090909091 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.0909090909 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179216409418 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074549788845 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532999602059 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108021395692 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481776494472 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.