The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The given line gaps provide information on the modifications in the number of electrical machines users and the volume of time for the household task in one country over a 100-year period.
From an overall perspective, it is conspicuous that all electrical equipment witnessed an upward trend over the year shown, whereas the reversed pattern should be observed for the number of hours used for household work in the second diagram.
Taking a first look at the share of people owning electrical appliances, in the beginning, the number of refrigerators was exactly 0 percent while there is 30 percent and 40 percent of residents had vacuum cleaners and washing machines respectively. In the 1940s, these numbers of all categories nearly had the same pattern, with were around the range of 50 and 60 percent users in one country. Noticeably, all of the habitats in one nation exposing to refrigerators and vacuum cleaners at the end of the period. However, due to the increment in the two mentioned appliances, the share of people getting a washing machine fluctuated and stand under 80 percent in 2019.
Moving to the time of people doing housework in this nation, while people consuming exactly 50 hours per week in 1920, this amount observe the decrement over the period. In the 1960s, the hour used for household tasks decreased by more than twofold times when compared with the beginning. Finally, at the end of the period, there were merely 10 hours per consumed for housework thanks to the development in technological appliances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rcent users in one country. Noticeably, all of the habitats in one nation exposing to refr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.015625 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80623216517 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55078125 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8139016047 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142503299148 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594923892909 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452261263175 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908614644177 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473212268023 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.