The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in country in 1985 and 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate information about the percentage of energy produced from a country's sources between 18985 to 2003.
Overall, the rate of oil production in this country was the largest compared to the rest of energy sources in both two years. And that is exactly opposite to the percentage of hydrogen energy
In 1985, the percentage of oil had reached 52% which was larger than the percentage of other energy sources. In the second place was nuclear energy with 22% and right after that was 13% of natural gas. And finally in 1980 the percentages were 8% and 4% of coal and hydrogen.
In 2003, the percentage of energy source changed. Although the percentage of oil still accounted for the most, it decreased by 13% in 1980. It was nuclear energy but it only decreased by 5%, while the nuclear energy remained unchanged. However, the rate of the natural gas increased by 10%, from 13% to 23%. And then, coal energy also rose to 13%.
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, second, so, still, then, while, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73493975904 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47530992794 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5202544125 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145203773177 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665170309126 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696051648897 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117093950187 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800441099911 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.