The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.
The given pie charts well compare information about the proportion of power generated for each resource (oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, hydro, and other renewable resources) in a country in 1985 and 2003. Overall, it is evident that the proportion of energy produced from oil and that produced from nuclear experienced a significant decrease, whilst the proportion of the other 4 resources underwent oppositely.
In detail, it can be explained that although the figure of energy produced from oil had accounted for the highest at 52% in 1985, it dropped to 39% in 2003; similarly, the figure of energy generated from nuclear dipped greatly from 22% at the beginning to 8% at the end. On the other hand, there was a growth by 10% in the figure of electricity generated by natural gas throughout those mentioned years, and became the greatest proportion in 2003 at 23%. Moreover, the proportion of power produced by other renewable resources also grew gently by 3% from 1985 to 2003. Finally, the proportion of hydropower underwent remained constant at 4% during eighteen-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | Mikul Patel | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | Mikul Patel | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
| 2018-04-11 | Thira | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Thira | 61 | view |
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major German airports between 2007 and 2012. 78
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050. 84
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- Writing, reading and maths are the three major subjects. Some people think that computer skills should be added as a fourth subject. What extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11235955056 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83527031032 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0909248984 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366075874469 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189177999328 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10153195441 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312312900666 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523019541062 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.