The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.
The given pie charts show the percentage of the energy consumed for different sources including oil, nuclear, hydrogen, coal, natural, and other renewable energy in a nation in the middle of 1985 and 2003.
According to the chart that, it is clear from that oil was the only energy leading in both years. Oil was consumed just over a half (52%) in 1985 but in 2003 it fell slightly to 39%. Hydrogen was remained stable in 1985 and 2003 at 4%. The least energy was used by other renewable sources. In 1985, they only used 1% where it jumped up minimally in 2003 to 4%.
The use of natural gas and coal showed an increase from 13% and 8% in 1985 to 23% and 13% in 2003. The nuclear energy showed decline from 22% to 17% over the given 18 years.
Overall, the greatest energy was produces from oil and the least from hydrogen and other renewable energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | Mikul Patel | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | Mikul Patel | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
| 2018-04-11 | Thira | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Thira | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes seriouspollution and uses up the world’s fuel resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The prevention of health problems is more important than treatment. Government funding should reflect that.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The pictures below show the plan of walton museum in 2008 and the plan in 2012 after it was redeveloped Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 700.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43037974684 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14675483489 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.520110294 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7777777778 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320020946246 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137462251917 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524350250917 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207337106934 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285336861277 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.