The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015.
The charts compare the way people in three different countries studying English in 2010 and 2015.
As can be seen from the charts, evening class accounted for the biggest part of the pie in all surveyed nations in both two years except for country B’s 2015 pie. Moreover, country C showed the greatest changes with the form of studying abroad appearing in 2015.
In particular, country A and country B had roughly similar figures in 2010, with the majority of their citizens learning English at evening class, of 70% and 72% respectively. Furthermore, a quarter of country A’s population studied online, compared to a fifth of country B’s. However, while the percentages of studying at night in country A decreased by 3% by 2% for online learning in 2015, the figure for evening lessons in country B fell to under a half with that for online remained the same. By 2015, the number for studying abroad in nation B had quadrupled to 32%.
Interestingly, there were only two means of learning English in country C in 2010, with a hefty 94% of evening classes and a tiny 6% of online sessions . Studying abroad only appeared in 2015 with 3%, which was a fifth of online class and one-twenty seventh for night class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...classes and a tiny 6% of online sessions . Studying abroad only appeared in 2015 w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79245283019 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60404722665 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2568262155 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301544965181 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152377635592 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12385529834 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234661647519 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13880024586 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.