The given charts illustrate the percentage of local government's total spending on different purposes between 2000 and 2010.
It is obvious from the charts that from 2000 to 2010, the proportion of expenditure on education was the highest, while other accounted for the smallest spending. Moreover, the local government tent to decline amount of money spent on the majority of sectors over 10 years.
In 2000, local government spent the largest amount of their money for education at 24%, which was moderately higher than that of healthcare with 21% and 5% higher than the figures for pensions. Additionally, the amount of money used for defence, welfare and interest on borrowing made up 17%, 8% and 5%, respectively. On the contrary, the smallest sectors were transport, culture, leisure, and other, which comprised a small fraction.
Over 10 years, the amount of money used for education witnessed a gradual downward trend to 21%, followed by healthcare and defence, which all dropped to 20% and 14%, respectively. Moreover, the figures for transport and culture and leisure fell together to 1% and were still the least spending of the government. Whereas the rate of pensions and other still remained stable at 19% and 1% over the period. Furthermore, expenditure on welfare and interest on borrowing rose substantially to 13% and 10% in 2010.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, still, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19178082192 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82349116045 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538812785388 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0505850181 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.7 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123669012567 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541886191076 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642420060867 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105180960205 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692275560585 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.