The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following charts illustrates what is the main purpose of students to study in terms of various age groups, with depicting the percentage of students who gain support from their employers regarding time off and fees.
As can be clearly observed from the first chart, two main reasons of career and interest are surveyed. The same proportion of students of 40-49 age group follow their study due to either career or interest by 40%. Unlike age groups which is under 39, over 49 students are pursuing their study mainly for interest, around 70%, in comparison with 30% of career. For under 26 students, the main reason is career by 80% and interest includes 20%. Followed by 26-29 students with 70% of career and 30% of interest. Students who are between 30 to 39 are more inclined to career with near 60% rather than for interest with above 20%.
Turning to employer support, the most support is allocated to under 26 by more than 60%. Age groups of 26-29 with 50% and over 49 with 40% are placed next positions. Employers support approximately the equal percentage of both 30-39 and 40-49 students by around 40%.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that, whereas under 26 aged students’ main purpose is career, they receive the maximum support from their employers with 60%. On the other hand, over 49 students follow their study mostly because of their interest, far more than other groups, while 30-39 aged students receive the least support of employers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The following charts illustrates what is the main purpose of students to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66533864542 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33480412383 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442231075697 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 251.0 22.4926829268 1116% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1171.0 112.824112599 1038% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 251.0 22.9334400587 1094% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 55.0 5.23603664747 1050% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288138854018 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.288138854018 0.103423049105 279% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208240382408 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562962085965 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 126.1 13.2329268293 953% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -157.91 61.2550243902 -258% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 97.6 10.3012195122 947% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.29 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.22 8.06136585366 226% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 102.4 10.9970731707 931% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.