The first graph gives information about studying in five different age groups in two categories, while employer support for the same ones in percentages.
To begin with, it can be clearly seen that according to the first graph when employers age the reason for studying for interest increases sharply from just around 10% to 70% from under 26 years age group to over 49. Conversely, those who study for a career is at the highest for under 26 which drops gradually by approximately just under 20% for the eldest age group.
To continue with, when it comes to the percentage of employer support, although there is a marginal decrease from the under 26 years age to about 29 ages, in the next three groups, the time off and help with fees slightly rose for the 40-49 and over 49 nearly 40% to 50% for over 49.
In conclusion, it is understood from both graphs that despite studying for interest shows an upward trend when aging, the employers’ support shows some variations depending on the age groups. Furthermore, usually, the 40-49 age group chooses to study for both reasons.
- The three pie charts below show how the changes in annual spending by a particular UK schools in 1981 1991 and 2001 89
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca Cola 78
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home 89
- The chart below shows information about different species of birds observed in Woodchuck county at different times of the year 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79255319149 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53398694939 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.738397637 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.166666667 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245026379439 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147677292516 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419951478919 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168961663395 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050444702061 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.