The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the proportion of time which working adults committed to various activities in a certain nation between 1958 and 2008.
Overall, the percentages of all the activities increased, except for going out, other hobbies and sleeping. It is also noticeable that working is the activity which received the most committed time during throughout the years.
In the year 1958, the proportion of working was the largest, about one-third of the entire proportion. Sleeping stood on the second place, at about 1% less. Outside social engagements took up around one-fifth of the whole proportion. Relaxing at home and other interests occupied 8% and 6% respectively. Commuting to work was in the last position, at precisely 2%.
In the year 2008, there was an increase in most kinds of the activities. Working went up by 9% and still held the top position. Home recreational activities was 5% higher., and going to the workplace quadrupled, from 2% to 8%. Going out saw a downward trend with 13% lower, which was equal to other pursuits (6%) as the lowest percentage. Sleeping was lower as well, which constituted one fourth of the entire proportion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-22 | Tung lam | 78 | view |
- People continue to re commit crimes even after being penalized for their wrongdoings Why do you thinik this happen How can crime be stopped 84
- A lot of people spend a major part of their adult life at work so job satisfaction is very important for individual happiness What are the main factors that contribute to job satisfaction What are the solutions for people who are unsatisfied with their jo 73
- The diagram below gives information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram shows a method of shaping glass containers Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e lowest percentage. Sleeping was lower as well, which constituted one fourth of t...
^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed one fourth of the entire proportion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, still, third, well, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06735751295 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83288467411 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621761658031 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4579829631 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2307692308 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8461538462 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131816092028 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459395067677 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568503081218 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102016303423 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703142009121 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e lowest percentage. Sleeping was lower as well, which constituted one fourth of t...
^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed one fourth of the entire proportion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, still, third, well, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06735751295 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83288467411 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621761658031 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4579829631 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2307692308 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8461538462 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131816092028 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459395067677 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568503081218 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102016303423 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703142009121 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.