The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate proportion of water consumption in three fields, namely, industrial, agricultural and domestic, use in six areas of the world.
In general, it can be concluded that many parts in the world could still not be able to reaching the industrialization scale.
Apart from North America and Europe, which have the rate of agricultural water use below 40 percent, with respectively 39 percent and 32 percent, others regions show their strength in the niche with enormous percentage, over 70 percent. Among those, Central Asia spends almost 90 percent amount of water for cultivating. In contrast, although not focusing in farming, North America and Europe seem to focus on developing industrial aspect by significant ratios of 48 percent and 53 percent respectively. Additionally, the area of Africa, Central Asia and South America only occupies a moderate figure, which is less than 10 percent. The figure of domestic use fills in an adequate number in almost pie charts, under 20 percent in all case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Eshana Pokhrel | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 64
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems should we discourage pEople to use cars. 84
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, apart from, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93350863488 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69696969697 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4367462834 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120903980638 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058809442508 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590428060143 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963125926144 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702212031312 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.