The graphs below ashow information about the weekly work hours in Australia in 2001.
The three pie charts illustrate the amount of working hours of Australian workers divided into two groups, the employees and the employers, and by time distributions.
In general, the total workforce of Australia comprised of 8.8 million people, most of them was hired. There was about 2 million of those was owners/managers. It can be seen from the charts that 40% of the total workforce working in long hours, which were over 41 hours per week, while about one third of them took a part-time jobs, and 27% worked from 35 to 40 hours a week.
Among 6.9 million employees, the majority of those chose to work part-time (38%). 33% was recorded to be worked in long hours and 29% was having a full-time jobs.
In contrast to that, the owners/managers had a different working time distribution. Specifically, more than a half of those spent time working in long hours whereas only approximately 20% and 15% chose to work full-time and part-time respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-17 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-20 | vuhieuquy | 100 | view |
| 2022-01-20 | vuhieuquy | view | |
| 2022-01-20 | vuhieuquy | view | |
| 2021-04-25 | Poinsettia03 | 92 | view |
- The graphs below ashow information about the weekly work hours in Australia in 2001 79
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050. 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 46, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this chose' or 'those choses'?
Suggestion: this chose; those choses
... 6.9 million employees, the majority of those chose to work part-time 38%. 33% was recorded...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, whereas, while, in contrast, in general, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94478527607 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95209981144 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8924321146 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199647680341 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864194762694 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476316762924 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120777786874 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456243259258 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.