The charts below show the percentage of working time in office spent on different tasks in the UK 1990 and 2000
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of working time in office used for various tasks in the UK in two years, namely 1990 and 2000.
In general, there were noticeable changes in the percentage of working hours in the office spent on using telephone, emails, paper documents, and talking with colleagues, while a constant trend can be seen if we look at the figures for meeting time and other things. It is also clear that that for paper documents was higher than for any other task over the period shown.
At the beginning of the period, 35% of working time in office was spent on paper documents, compared to only 12% on using the telephone and 6% on using emails. Over the following 10 years, The Uk saw the proportion of time that workers in office spent on paper documents decrease to 30%. During the same period, the percentage of working time in office used for using telephone dropped to 8%; however, the figure for using emails increased sharply, to 23%
In 1990, talking with colleagues accounted for 17% of the total working time, while the figures for other things and meeting time were lower, at 46% and 14%. After 10 years, the proportion of working hours in office spent on talking with colleagues fell considerably, dropping to 9%. Furthermore, the percentage of working time used for meeting time remained unchanged, and the figure for other things maintain stability
- The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Pentland 67
- The charts below describe the numbers of people per household in 1995 and 2005 of an European country 61
- The charts below show the percentage of time spent by working adults on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...time and other things. It is also clear that that for paper documents was higher than for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...gures for other things and meeting time were lower, at 46% and 14%. After 10 years, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82008368201 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49094928628 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47280334728 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3669113249 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29930124691 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161681695144 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885693432734 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226955294698 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892811297189 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.