The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney, Australia in 1997 and 2007.
The pie charts illustrate the changes and differences in the proportions of water used in six different elements in Sydney, Australia in 1997 and 2007. Overall, what stands out from the graph is there were downward trends in most categories, except for the household use and service industry that bucked the trend. Noticeably, food industry constantly dominated the water consumption in both years.
In particular, when it comes to building industry and Manufacturing, the graph witnessed slight decreases from 5%, 11% for the former to 2%, 11% for the latter in the percentages of water use, which consecutively accounted for the lowest numbers. Similarly, regarding Food industry, the figure stood at 48% in 1997, then declined marginally by 7% in 2007, which continuously occupied the highest percentages.
In stark contrast, in terms of household use, a slight growth from 19% to 21% was experienced in the proportion of water consumption. Meanwhile, concerning Service industry, the percentage of water use finished at 25% in 2007, which was doubled in comparison with that in 1997, particularly at 13%.
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts below show the proportions of energy produced from 5 sources in a country in 1995 and 2003 78
- The given scheme describes the production process of instant noodles 78
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss Both views and give your opinion 84
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y and Manufacturing, the graph witnessed slight decreases from 5%, 11% for the fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3125 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05091416154 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1622923805 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.571428571 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301793860917 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139910691897 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142860803691 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198452524785 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737699741992 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.