The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The charts provide pictorial illustration of the financial allocation to roads and transport in four different countries, recorded over a 15-year timescale from 1990 to 2005, with statistical data measured in the unit of percentage.
By and large, all the mentioned countries underwent a general downward trend, with Portugal holding the dominant position in the field of financial allocation to traffic. In contrast, the United Kingdom hit the trough of the total graphic in 2000, with the percentage of finance of 7.
Specifically, at the starting point of roundly 20% in 1990, the figures for Italy then decreased by 4% in the following five years, and eventually finishing the whole 15-year period with 12% of its national budget allocated to routes and transportation. Reaching the peak of 27% in the beginning year, the proportion for Portugal fell sharply to 20% in 1995; throughout the following years the country took a gradual nosedive in percentage and made a final point of 16% at the end of the given timespan. The UK held a modest section of the total state fundings on traffic, with its figures starting at 11%, then reaching up to 13% in 1995 and undergoing a minor variation in the two final years. The USA was the only country that experienced the pattern of frequent fluctuations throughout periods, making its percentage of state funding ranging about 14% annually.
- The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
- In the modern world schools are no longer necessary because there is so much information available through the internet that children can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The charts provide pictorial illustratio...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ta measured in the unit of percentage. By and large, all the mentioned countrie...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., with the percentage of finance of 7. Specifically, at the starting point of r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in contrast, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06113537118 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88011047124 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593886462882 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3126811322 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.571428571 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920429958538 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423930015314 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574532431185 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779628830892 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705576082594 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.