• Task 1: The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The charts show the information on how much proportion of expenses the government took for roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the percentage of spending on roads and transport in four countries witnessed a downward trend over 15 years. Moreover, the highest percentage belonged to Portugal while the UK used the least percentage of spending on roads and transport.
It is substantial that above two-fifths Portugal’s budget was poured into roads and transport in 1990. Following that, the figure showed a sharp decrease of 7 percent in 1995 and then gradually fell to 16 percent in 2005. Only 11% of spending on roads and transport was recorded in the UK in 1990. After a slight rise to 13% in 1995, the proportion of spending remarkably declined to around 7 percent in the next ten years.
With 20 percent, Italy ranked second in 1990. In the next 10 years, there was a drop to 12% and the number finished at 13% in 2005. In addition, USA showed a leveling of in the whole examined period with the start at 13% and the finish at 12 percent.
- Task 1 The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 78
- Task 1 11
- The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- Task 1 The diagram below shows the process of growing and preparing pineapples and pineapple products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68947368421 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6629758623 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4325517673 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254642594424 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105747592156 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094225716029 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174781088877 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106532565547 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.