The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003.
The provided pie charts represent the amount of energy generated by different sources in a particular nation in the period of 18 years from 1985 till 2003.
As can be observed, in 1985, oil was the major source of energy which generated nearly half of the total quantity of energy. Nuclear sources were the second common sources of energy with the production of just over one-fifth of total energy. Energy provided by natural gas, coal and hydrogen was contributed nearly a quarter of total proportion while the other renewable sources provided merely 1% which was the least production of energy.
As the time passed, in 2003, there was a noticeable decrease in the production of nuclear energy which fell down upto 17% whereas the energy production from hydrogen remained similar till 2003. At the end of 2003, there was a significant decline in the energy generation from oil and the proportion reached down upto two-fifths. While, the energy provided by the natural gas, coal, hydrogen and other renewable sources witnessed incline over the given period.
Overall, there was a dramatic reduction in the production of oil whereas other remained resources grew substantially at the end of given period.
- If a product is good or it meets people needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than an entertainment Do you agree or disagree 77
- some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money Discuss both views and give your opini 92
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK ,divided into three categories,from 1995 to 2002 73
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 79
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of University students in three different countries. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted nearly a quarter of total proportion while the other renewable sources provid...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12626262626 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61130648117 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469696969697 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9341925756 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25190094955 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126644108835 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808374602524 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164238745015 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109179546289 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.