some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people argue that it is futile to spend money on the species that are going to be extinct while others opponents are not agreed with it.I intend to discuss both perspectives and I personally believe that it is necessary to fund some money in order to save endangered species.
My main argument to support my opinion is that animals are the important part of our environment. They help to maintain the ecological balance of the nature. If an extinction is appeared in the species then it will directly affect the food chain and create disturbance. For example, grass is produced on the land and is eaten by the herbivores. Herbivores are then become a prey of carnivores and the process further goes on. If the herbivores are get escaped then the species of carnivores will be come to endangered list. It means that it is a natural cycle and any disturbance would be very harmful for the different kind of species. So,government should spend some money on the caring, rearing, feeding and breeding to save the endangered species by keeping them in the zoos and wildlife sanctuaries.
However, others claim that extinction is a natural process. If old species had disappeared then the new species have also come appeared in order to maintain the life cycle. Such as the records can be seen which show that from the origin of life on earth, hundreds of species have been extinct and many have faced the evolution.
So there is no need to spend millions of dollars in the research and protection of the species and this money can be used for other various important projects in the Welfare of human life. In many countries, governments have tried to save some species like the Asian elephant and tiger, which are going to be extinct in the next few decades but the governments effort have not produced satisfied results and hence, the conditions are similar as they used to be. So these efforts were just wastage of time and money.
To conclude, there is no doubt in saying that extinction is a natural phenomena but with some precautions and by providing care, the number of species can be protected and they can be saved to survive for the next centuries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | jasminabts | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sutriani | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sutriani | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-22 | Ranjit Singh | 92 | view |
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of University students in three different countries. 61
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 79
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 66
- If a product is good or it meets people needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than an entertainment Do you agree or disagree 77
- some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money Discuss both views and give your opini 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...others opponents are not agreed with it.I intend to discuss both perspectives and...
^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... species. My main argument to support my opinion is that animals are the impor...
^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ivores and the process further goes on. If the herbivores are get escaped then the...
^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , government
...ul for the different kind of species. So,government should spend some money on the caring, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 780, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ered species by keeping them in the zoos and wildlife sanctuaries. However, ot...
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m that extinction is a natural process. If old species had disappeared then the ne...
^^
Line 6, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...extinct in the next few decades but the governments effort have not produced satisfied resu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 71, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
... in saying that extinction is a natural phenomena but with some precautions and by provid...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, while, for example, kind of, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5979334363 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3356667015 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.9375 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205104243946 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625055782532 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649658918769 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121220979501 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546381257903 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.