The pictures depict the percentages of British pupils who had mastered other languages beside English, in 2000 and 2010. In general, we can see that the percentage of French speaking pupils, along with pupils who did not master any foreign languages had decreased. Meanwhile, the groups of pupils who spoke Spanish only, who spoke another foreign language, and who spoke 2 other foreign languages had their percentages increased.
To begin with, pupils who did not speak any foreign languages were accounted for 20% in 2000, whilst ten years later this percentage dropped significantly to 10% only. Following this trend, the proportions of French only speaking pupils also decreased by 5% from its initial 15% figure in 2000. As for German only speaking pupils, the percentage did not change over the years (10%).
In contrast, the percentage of Spanish speaking pupils increased from 30% to 35%. This also happened in the group of pupils who spoke another language, in which its figure increased by 5% from its 15% figure in 2000. An increased percentage could also be seen in the group of pupils who spoke 2 other foreign languages, where in 2000 they were only made up by 15% of students, whereas in 2010 5% more pupils belonged to this group.
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Birth rates and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 79
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola. 84
- Technology allows food to be produced in greater quantities and at lower prices Some people believe that this positive development while a this feel that the change is harmfuldiscuss 71
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 64
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'as for', 'in contrast', 'in general', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235772357724 0.268076937826 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.142276422764 0.116061578633 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0609756097561 0.0759168565197 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0569105691057 0.0366838410393 155% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243902439024 0.0131127313244 186% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138211382114 0.155750635184 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0487804878049 0.0379272487307 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.52410151051 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0162601626016 0.0210936926555 77% => OK
Particles: 0.00406504065041 0.00175180941692 232% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0772357723577 0.0948980150116 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00813008130081 0.00437022459523 186% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0406504065041 0.00967000014798 420% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1251.0 1161.00487805 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.9 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95714285714 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361904761905 0.337110787985 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247619047619 0.247514529752 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17619047619 0.171178102325 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128571428571 0.112407865282 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52410151051 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.546246751206 91% => OK
Word variations: 43.3057301603 49.3433353143 88% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.3333333333 23.0094962315 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.16095309 42.9750493124 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 135.714022679 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 23.0094962315 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 48.0952380952 47.7609492067 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.89090909091 2.94281807926 64% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374138809249 0.418131533498 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.184273060003 0.181151798455 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0823298754995 0.0850326197045 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.676995654292 0.706616315825 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0925291522231 0.157042692854 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204002311166 0.228904883108 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907759205977 0.108899403657 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.387440951721 0.367819155151 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0409771624263 0.0812612215331 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279413694553 0.316326947829 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494025877746 0.0921553760075 54% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.