The figure depicts energy consumption and production differences in the US within 50 year period, starting in 1950, with the projections to 2025. The unit used in this figure is in 1 quadribillion of British Thermal Units (BTU) per unit.
In general, the amount of energy produced and consumed had always been increasing since 1950. It can also be noted that the number of energy consumption had always exceeded that of produced, where the gap between the numbers is projected to even be higher in the future.
In 1950, Americans used a slightly over 25 units of energy. The number was increasing throughout the year, reaching a peak of approximately 85 units in 2000. In early 2000s, it would slightly fall to more or less 80 units, before eventually have a significant grow to around 130 units in 2025.
As for the energy production, in 1850 the figure was noted to be 25 units. It steadily climbed following the growth of consumption to approximately 50 units in 1975. Unfortunately, the growth had ever since become less significant, marking the number of more or less 55 units in 2000. It would afterwards reach only slightly 20 units more in 2025.
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola. 84
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation Why is this the case What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 82
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010. 73
- Technology allows food to be produced in greater quantities and at lower prices Some people believe that this positive development while a this feel that the change is harmfuldiscuss 71
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'so', 'as for', 'in general', 'more or less']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212669683258 0.220444632235 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.140271493213 0.167888034529 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.027149321267 0.0606518309736 45% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0904977375566 0.0506257000042 179% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0180995475113 0.118615021944 15% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.162895927602 0.107062808482 152% => OK
Participles: 0.0633484162896 0.041066498444 154% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81491372861 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027149321267 0.0385302599488 70% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00132118243153 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0904977375566 0.0714148451538 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0135746606335 0.0191574576366 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00452488687783 0.00930345855455 49% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1160.0 1141.60824742 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 206.134020619 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82914572864 5.53046319177 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.78085437643 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326633165829 0.284621296913 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.211055276382 0.211203875043 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160804020101 0.133321485273 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110552763819 0.0843313296314 131% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81491372861 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 127.690721649 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.622163163488 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.8635325575 62.8969750728 79% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 12.9587628866 85% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0909090909 16.4300151701 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6629580555 44.7399317507 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 90.9928171075 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 16.4300151701 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.613754768223 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.09278350515 0% => OK
Readability: 39.1964367291 37.5504026743 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.76363636364 1.13073093955 156% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441567847696 0.331212695627 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111313744103 0.0927372745006 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0507333916724 0.0736520305886 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.63905077937 0.579516596996 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119675654488 0.180689518051 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21323436017 0.122183219658 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113819565152 0.0765303033291 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.389106005842 0.211926503985 184% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.131534797542 0.0737400523855 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322315656554 0.203819188451 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743292474947 0.067151250289 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.45360824742 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.48453608247 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.0206185567 25% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 4.73195876289 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 1.03092783505 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.56701030928 39% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 8.32989690722 60% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.