The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The diagrams illustrate The UK students in one of England’s University who was able to communicate in different language in a decade. Overall, there were two languages (spanish and french) experienced a decrease spoken number, while no other language and two other languages saw an increasing figure. In addition, no other language observed as the highest number in the reported year.
The student who mainly spoke English accounted as the biggest figure in both years. It shared a-third in 2000 and increased to about 5% in 2010. Following which was spanish (20%). Then, french only and another language shared a similar number, 15% each. Finally german and two other languages saw as the lowest number on additional language spoken by the student, 10% respectively.
In 2010, three categories of the language used to communicate by the students (no other language, another language, and two other languages) increased to about 5% each. In contrast, spanish only and french only experienced a decreasing trend, 10%, and 5% respectively. Furthermore, the number of students who communicate in german remained unchanged that of 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the daily consumption of three spreads per person from 1981 to 2007 in a country. 73
- Q: In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 56
- government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money. government must invest this money in public services instead. to what extend do you agree with this statement? 78
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with students behaviour.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...uage shared a similar number, 15% each. Finally german and two other languages saw as t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, then, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34444444444 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92129262781 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6315840183 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287506647464 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109545231436 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736587415401 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209381837432 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349144481299 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.