The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 200 and 2010

The pie charts illustrate the percentages of British students who can speak different languages as well as English at one University in England.
Overall, we can see that the highest portion was belong to students who do not knew any other language through the periods given. However, the number of students who can speak 2 languages or another language, rose in the final year. Those who knew only German remained the same.
The number of pupils who did not learn other language increased from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010. Followed by those who can talk another language which was 15% in 2000 and rose to 20% latter. Moreover, there was a slight growth of the proportion of students that they can speak two other languages in 2000 and 2010 ( 10% and 15% respectively).
On the other hand, there was a dramatical decline of pupils who speak spanish only ( 20% to 10% respectively). Also, the number of students who speak german remained equial through the periodes given.

Votes
Average: 3.9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...we can see that the highest portion was belong to students who do not knew any other l...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'periods'' or 'period's'?
Suggestion: periods'; period's
...not knew any other language through the periods given. However, the number of students ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eak two other languages in 2000 and 2010 10% and 15% respectively. On the other ...
^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...decline of pupils who speak spanish only 20% to 10% respectively. Also, the numbe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7619047619 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48974654704 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529761904762 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0386582199 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32492288474 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143970480003 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101049161697 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223902127768 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106565982698 0.0819641961636 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.