The two charts give information about how many British students at one university in England could speak English and another languages in 2000 and 2010. In general, the proportion of British students who were able to speak Spanish was the biggest in both given years, while that of the students who could speak another languages was the smallest.
More specifically, in 2000, the shares of students who could speak anly French and another language were equal with 15%. Similarly, the percents of the students who were able to speak in two aother languages besides English and who could speak only German were also equal (10%). The percentage of British students who could speak English was the second highest (20%) in this time frame.
In regards to 2010, the proportions of students able to speak only French and the students who spoke German, also, who could speak solely in English were the same (10%). Moreover the figures of students able to speak another language and those who could speak other two languages were 20%and 15%, respectively.
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 100
- The bar chart gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...ond highest 20% in this time frame. In regards to 2010, the proportions of students able ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ak solely in English were the same 10%. Moreover the figures of students able to speak a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98285714286 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35470176629 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451428571429 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1127652742 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476921370328 0.215688989381 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275418649848 0.103423049105 266% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680623372569 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.38707928268 0.15604864568 248% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447076854491 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.