The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of British students from a regional university who were polygots in 2000 and 2010.
After a decade, Spanish speakers still accounted for the majority, followed by bilingual and multilingual students, with an upward trend.
Scrutinizing the year 2000, students who were fluent in Spanish dominated nearly one-third of the chart. Ranked second was learners who capable of using their mother-tongue only, with 20%. Furthermore, pupil who study French and another language both reach the same statical, proven by a mere 15%. Likely to that movement, the figure of German and two other languages also expressed equally proportion, which were also the lowest of all.
Ten years later, surprisingly, the percentage of students who were able to speak Spanish increased notably 5%. The identical trend applied to the figure of two other languages, while German users remained unchanged. Although the proportion of students who knows no other language than English experience a dramatical decrease, it can be consider as a positive development for students.
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems 86
- The graphs below ashow information about the weekly work hours in Australia in 2001 79
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 100
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84233157457 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268597755136 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103984167881 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833021166419 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154314857932 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957436276989 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.