The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The given pie charts illustrate the rate of students in an university level at united kingdom who might speak others languages beside English language in 2000 and 2010.
In general, it can be seen that, in 2000, the highest percentage for students in UK who can talk other languages was to Spanish language. Whist, in 2010, the lowest proportion for students in England who can speak other languages was German, and French languages. Similarity, for students who could not speak any language rather than English.
To begin with, 2000 year, it can be observed that, the Spanish language was occupied first language by 30% for British students who could contact with other languages. While 20% of those student could not speak any language. In addition, the rate of students who talked German language was 10%. Moreover, For French and another language, the per cent was 15%. Finally, there were some students spoke two languages (10%).
Turning to 2010 year, it can be witnessed that, the rate of Spanish language increased by 5% for students who could speak it if compared with 2000. Whereas, the rate of German language still the same proportion in 2000 and stood on 10%. In 2010, the rate of learning French language decreased to 10% which is less than the rate in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 67
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...harts illustrate the rate of students in an university level at united kingdom wh...
^^
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rts illustrate the rate of students in an university level at united kingdom who ...
^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... level at united kingdom who might speak others languages beside English language...
^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...guage was occupied first language by 30% for British students who could contact ...
^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st language by 30% for British students who could contact with other languages. ...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...who could contact with other languages. While 20% of those student could not speak an...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'those students'?
Suggestion: this student; those students
...tact with other languages. While 20% of those student could not speak any language. In additi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0% which is less than the rate in 2000.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, while, as to, in addition, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8801843318 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38338412066 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497695852535 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9776361771 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.25 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371574472433 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163298912227 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951338154588 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273539229368 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746278907928 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.