The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the percentages of undergraduate in England who can talk about other languages besides english between the year 2000 to 2010.
it can be clearly seen a decrease of only speak english. Overall, the trend of speak other languages rises in general.
In 2000, the proportion of no other language is biggest with 30%, which was increased to 35% slightly in 2010. For french only, it declined by 5% softly from 15% to 10% during these ten years, whereas the British classmates who spoke spanish only were dropped from 20% to 10% significantly. Moreover, the remain unchanged circumstance occurred on people who spoke german only, it kept in 10%. As a result, the percentage of students who can speak french, german and spanish is the same at 2010.
The percentage of another language, besides french, german and spanish, is lightly increased by 5%, started from 15% in 2000 and ended at 20% in 2010. More undergraduates knew two other languages after ten years, from 10% rose to 15%.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- the chart below show that UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go in to full- time work did after leaving college in 2008 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... english between the year 2000 to 2010. it can be clearly seen a decrease of onl...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...glish between the year 2000 to 2010. it can be clearly seen a decrease of only ...
^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rom 20% to 10% significantly. Moreover, the remain unchanged circumstance occurred on peop...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...after ten years, from 10% rose to 15%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, whereas, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64659439115 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9054437946 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235918949491 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104168231032 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574025113697 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151421221966 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453408572562 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.