The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
The charts provide information about travelers in the US in 2009, namely why they travelled and what troubled them.
Overall, it is clear that commuting to and from work served as the principal reason for travelling while the most problematic aspect of travelling was its cost.
A close examination of the first chart shows that work was the most popular reason for travel, accounting for nearly a half. Around one fifth went out for personal reasons whereas shopping and social as well as recreation activities constituted only 16% and one tenth, respectively. Merely 6% of the travelers were motivated by the purpose of visiting friends and relatives.
Turning to the problems, the price of travel represented up to 36%, almost doubled the second highest figure for safety concerns. Next come those who were troubled by aggressive drivers (17%) and highway congestion (14%). The two least significant problems were access to public transport and space for pedestrian, representing less than 10% each.
- In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of a large, extended family. Is this a positive or negative trend? 84
- The maps below show a book store in 2000 and now. Summarise the main information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant 67
- Some educational systems make students study specialised subjects from the age of fifteen while others require students to study a wide range Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 64
- the table below shows the expenditures of four car companies in the UK in 2002. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were troubled by aggressive drivers 17% and highway congestion 14%. The two leas...
^^
Line 13, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trian, representing less than 10% each.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31677018634 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75546880038 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.72049689441 0.547539520022 132% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6877373406 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432167776635 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163295608856 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109916961828 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24168576496 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588128128326 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.