The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006.
The bar charts gives information about in UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. The data presents in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the most increase was gas in UK and USA while the most decrease was coal in UK and USA.
In the one hand in 2000, oil and coal gained at around 20% to 30% in UK while oil and coal got to approximately 30% to 40% in USA which the biggest category. Than, followed by gas which stood at clearly 20% in UK and USA was the second biggest percentage. Next, followed by nuclear power which market at estimately 10% to 20% in UK whereas nuclear power and other renewable sources which noted at estimately 0% to 10% in USA was the third biggest percentage. Finally, the last position was other renewable sources which was counted at about 0% to 10% in UK.
On the other hand in 2006, gas and oil’s percentage of energy consumption both of countries happened to be increase which was standing at approxiamately 10% to 20% whilst coal, nuclear power, and other renewable experienced decrease which stood at around 0% to 20%.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 56
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities study. Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'give'.
Suggestion: give
The bar charts gives information about in UK and USA energy ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entage. Overall, it can be seen that the most increase was gas in UK and USA whil...
^^
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
... 40% in USA which the biggest category. Than, followed by gas which stood at clearly...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, so, third, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57731958763 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61821168277 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453608247423 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4830431735 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230363188391 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137465534519 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161129258492 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198360727379 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140228453294 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.