The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996.
The pie charts compares the proportion on seven different category in US between 1966 with that of 1996. Overall it can be seen that the greatest change was in the percentage of spending patterns was cars while the lowest of all the tot of it was food.
According to the illustration in 1966, the most popular of expenses was food, representing just more than two fifth of all expenses, by 1996 it had fallen significantly to minority just 14%. At 23% cars was the second most popular subject to expenses and this figure increased dramatically to more than two fifth after thirty years to represent the largest proportion of spending patterns in 1996. Initially, expenses on the restaurant was fairly low, at only 7%. However, this figure increased dramatically over the thirty years to 14%. furthermore, only 1% of the US population's money went to purchasing computers which that had the lowest of patterns in 1966 but this category arise to 10% in 1996.
Less change was seen in the remaining three spending patterns in 1996. Expenses on the book decreased to 10%. The second category was furniture which fallen at 8% and the last petrol was 8%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...pares the proportion on seven different category in US between 1966 with that of 1996. O...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...matically over the thirty years to 14%. furthermore, only 1% of the US populations money we...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82828282828 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67903467943 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.4782840398 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233190422871 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973077175773 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104336849387 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173980470874 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663609694475 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.