The given circular chart depicts the information about the intake of different nutrients per person in the USA. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
Looking in overall, it shows the highest data onto dinner and snacks per person and in contrary side the breakfast by far the lowest figure in given of period.
Commencing with the ratio of sodium in dinner and lunch is 29% and 43%, respectively. Similarly, the percentage of breakfast and snacks is analogous which is collected at 14%. In addition, the proportion of saturated fat in dinner is 37%, in comprised of lunch has 26%.
Furthermore, the percentage of the regular intake of saturated fat in breakfast is 16%, meanwhile in the snacks has 5% more in given of time. However, the ratio of added sugar per person in dinner is 23%, whears the snacks have slowly (4%) doubled it. Moreover, the varied significant difference in breakfast and lunch, the former has 16% and the latter has 19%.
- The graph shows the spending on education medical care and pension in a particular country from 2001 to 2051 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 73
- Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed if they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others however believe that is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... per person in dinner is 23%, whears the snacks have slowly 4% doubled it. Moreov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88343558282 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69867531066 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4854463734 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4444444444 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13975921472 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547385109738 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635037658888 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906660483615 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498979394028 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.