The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The bar charts illustrate the number of Uk’s students who are graduates and postgraduates who did not choose to become full-time workers in 2008, including part-time workers, charity workers, further students and unemployed workers. Overall, the number of further students were significantly high, yet the figures for charity workers were sharply low.
A closer look at the bar charts reveal that in 2008, the number of further study reached a peak in both graduates and postgraduates, accounted for 29,665 students and 2.725 students respectively. Similarly, the figures for part-time employees ranked second in both charts, constituted 17,735 students and 2,535 students respectively.
However, turning to remaining students who were charity workers and unemployed employees was significantly low. The number of employees who worked in charity groups became the lowest figures in the two charts, constituted 3500 with graduates and 345 with postgraduates. Similarly, the figures for unemployed students ranked third, accounted for 16,235 with graduates and 1,625 with postgraduates.
- Some people think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today In the interest of public health governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalization produces positive effects for everyone To what extent to you agree or disagree 11
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... illustrate the number of Uk’s students who are graduates and postgraduates who did not...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ures in the two charts, constituted 3500 with graduates and 345 with postgraduate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, similarly, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89937106918 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0063550952 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48427672956 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9435967237 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225613446844 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107490884006 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947753575375 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161029775978 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069411153264 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.