The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts depict the destinations of the graduates and postgraduate students of the UK that did not engage themselves in full-time work after college education in 2008.
Most of the graduates of the UK were pursuing further study at around 29,665 people as the bar chart suggests. The second dominant activity they chose was part-time work and unemployment which counted 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. A little portion of them chose voluntary work counting 3500 at that time.
The postgraduate students chose these options not so polarising like the graduates. They chose further study, part-time work, and unemployment in a decreasing order at around 2725, 2535 and 1624 respectively. The insignificant number of them did voluntary work counting 345.
Students of both domains prefer further study mostly and least interested in voluntary work, the numbers of which in both cases were insignificant. While the graduates involved in part-time work and unemployment are almost the same in amount, the postgraduates involved in part-time work and pursued further study are almost the same in number.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | jhanvimody | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view | |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view | |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
- The graph below shows usual water usage in millions of cubic meters by industries in some countries in a year 10
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants 63
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45664739884 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94855485664 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520231213873 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1874125513 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218087526943 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102982102233 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101090081758 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173792409586 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120391253588 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.