The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed, employed or further education in 1980, 1990, and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of high school graduates who were in three different statuses in Australia between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the number of high school graduates students that attend for further education was highest in 1980, whereas in 1990 and 2000, about half of those went to work. In addition, the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates being unemployed was not significant over the 3 years.
Turning to 1980, 50% of students participated in higher levels of education, making it the most common choice throughout the year. Subsequently, the figure for graduate students who had jobs accounted for 40%, followed by those unemployed, with only 10%. Regarding the year 1990, the figure for those who chose higher education decreased by 12% but increased by 10% in the percentage of employed individuals. Moreover, it was observed that only 12% of students were unemployed this year.
Looking at the year 2000, the proportion of go-to-work people rose to 55%, while people with bachelor’s or higher degrees and people who opted to stay at home witnessed downward trends in the figures, at 37% and 8% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | ngocanh005 | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | ngocanh005 | view | |
| 2023-06-11 | baguette | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and the plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- TOPIC It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22043010753 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82501686977 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0987758334 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365556400095 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148464532379 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967707903909 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213640281094 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117826484709 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.