The charts give information about world forest in five different regions
The pie charts compare five different areas, namely South America, Africa, Asia, Europe and North America, in terms of the proportion of global forest and timber.
It is immediately obvious that forests in Africa make up the largest percentage of total world forest, the opposite is true for Europe. Additionally, North America is the country with the biggest amount of timber, while the figure for Africa by far lowest.
Regarding forest, just over half of all forest in the world is found in Africa and North America, at 27% and 25% respectively. In contrast, South America's forests only contribute 16% to the total of forests on the planet and for Europe, this number is 14%. The data for Asia countries is 18%.
Relating to the rates of timber in these areas, North America contains the greatest proportion, at 30%, while 23% and 20% of global wood can be discovered in South America and Europe, sequentially. Despite having the highest percentage of forests in five regions, however, the number of lumber in Africa merely occupies 9% of world timber, which is exactly by half of Asia.
- The graph below gives information about U S government spending on the research between 1980 and 2008 88
- The illustration shows information about how an igloo is built from snow 73
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day 10
- The given maps show two di erent underground passage frameworks for autos in two Australian refers to 78
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 27% and 25% respectively. In contrast, South Americas forests only contribute 1...
^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r of lumber in Africa merely occupies 9% of world timber, which is exactly by hal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90810810811 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52569555904 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5314108611 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147813312211 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734871161256 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585153697428 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102821174704 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206252997271 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.