The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007
The charts represent the number of people being affected by four types of noise emission in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007.
In general, it can be seen that the number of residents suffering from cacophonous sounds in metropolitan is greater than those who live in rural areas, especially the noise from traffic. Another noticeable feature is that the number of civilians who bear the contamination of harsh sounds during daytime is much greater than those who have to put up with it during nighttime.
In 2007, there was a huge number of citizens suffering from noise pollution during both areas, especially those who had undergone nightmares with traffic noise contamination which was about 64 million and 34 million in the daytime. At night the traffic noise caused nightmares for 48 million citizens, which double the figure for rural areas. Noise contamination came from trains had less effect on people compared with traffic noise which was 10 million and 8 million in cities respectively during daytime and 8 million and 6 million in the suburb respectively at night.
The remaining two features of noise emission were less remarkable. In metropolitans, daytime aircraft sound affected 4 million residents and 2 million people in rural areas; whereas, there were only 1 million people from both areas born aircraft emission at night. There was no effect from industry on suburb citizens. However, 1 million city residents experienced noise from an industrial zone in the daytime which was 4 times higher than the number at night
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0859375 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6905755476 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4765625 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8096982102 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.2 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330427514289 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157586321746 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170852046423 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282874700954 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215817670282 0.0819641961636 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.