The pie chart compares the number of secondary school graduates who decided to have further education or vocation or being unemployed in Australia in a two-decade period from 1980to 2000.
Overall, what stands out of the chart is while in 1980 half of the total graduates went for further education, that figure plummeted in 2000, a little over a third, and the majority of secondary school leavers became employees. An interesting fact is, a minority of school leavers were unemployed in all the three different years.
In 1980, while only one in ten graduates were unemployed, that figure increased by 2% in the following decade. However, the figure slightly dropped in 2000, at 8%. Meanwhile, at the beginning of the period, two-fifth of the young graduates got employed, that percentage incrementally raised in 1990 and 2000, at 50% and 55% respectively.
With regard to further education, the majority of 50% of the new graduates decided to attain that in 1980, the rate dropped in the later decades. Whereas in 1990 and 2000 the highest percentage of secondary school leavers opt for employment, the figure for Further education declined by 38% and 37% respectively.
- The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centres It is feared that this could have a negative influence on the young and society To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12435233161 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83689048007 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544041450777 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7632833194 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1160566077 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519727132961 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522569853554 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808039968131 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053641120042 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.