The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
It is clear from this chart that there are different average levels of participation in education and it indicates the upmost levels of educational people in the period between 2000 till 2010 in Singapore.
Overall, in 2000, the spent years at school for both genders were in the lowest statue. Also, the postgraduate degrees were not in the best levels. While, in 2010, the students were studying the most number of years in this stage and qualifications were better the past.
At the beginning of the third millennium, adults’ boys stayed in the educational organization up 8 years, but the adults’ girls spent studying just for 8 years. The highest qualification attained by students was the high school degrees, and It was roughly one-third. The lowest qualification was the master degrees, and it was around 7.5 percent.
On the other hand, after ten years, it is noticed that there is a variation of number of years which students spent them in studying. In this time, males spent more than a decade studying at school. Average percentage of years of education for females did not change a lot, but the moderate percentage of academic qualifications boomed and increased. Also, they were better than the past.
- People nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past What do you think is the reason behind this What are the effects on individuals and people around them 73
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 11
- Some people think that enjoying the present is more important than planning for the future for both countries and individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree
- Take a look at the question and the graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the info 56
- Some people think that some types of criminals should not go to prison Instead they should do unpaid work in the community To what extent do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d between 2000 till 2010 in Singapore. Overall, in 2000, the spent years at sch...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d qualifications were better the past. At the beginning of the third millennium...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egrees, and it was around 7.5 percent. On the other hand, after ten years, it i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02450980392 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79070569113 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4810604581 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234738861337 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751639311264 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144311278759 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172841578538 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198307486068 0.0819641961636 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.