The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The chart below illustrates the average educational involvement of adults in schools, while the pie charts show the various educational levels of adults in Singapore from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, male participation in schools throughout the whole period outnumbered female involvement. In addition, the level of education people were achieving had increased over the period.
As detailed in the chart, Singaporean men in 2000 spent nearly 9 years in school, which is slightly higher than women, who spent precisely 8 years. In a ten-year period, the figure for women remained nearly the same for years 2002, 2004, and 2008 before showing a slight change by the year 2010, reaching about 9 years. On the contrary, men's attendance during the period was progressively increasing, reaching a peak of approximately 12 years by 2010.
According to the pie charts, over one-third of Singapore's population completed high school in 2000. Primary and secondary school enrollments were nearly comparable, at 26.3% and 25.77%, respectively, compared to roughly 8% studying for a master's degree. After ten years, Singaporeans had much greater levels of education, with just over the third holding college degrees and barely 2% having completed basic school.
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that Art gives our lives meaning and purpose Others believe that it is merely a distraction from real life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 88
- Some people think that some types of criminals should not go to prison Instead they should do unpaid work in the community To what extent do you agree 56
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, third, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4381443299 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91497921721 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69587628866 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8276456815 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302549118974 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118949320197 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171675476769 0.0843802449381 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217514881022 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.218230217808 0.0819641961636 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.