The charts show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much

Essay topics:

The charts show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much

The given pie charts provide information relating to the proportion of different types of nutrients in typical meals, which can be detrimental for heath if consumed a lot.
Overall, it is noticeable that, sodium and saturated fat is consumed much at dinner time while added sugar is common to eat for snack. Another interesting information is that sodium is consumed at an equal proportion for breakfast and snacks.
Looking at the details, the proportion of sodium and saturated fat consumed for dinner is much higher than other typical meals with 43 and 37% respectively. Also, the percentage of these nutrients is almost the same with 29% for sodium and 26% for fat being the second most popular nutrient.
The proportion of sugar consumed differs in meals. While added sugar is the most concumed product with 42% for snacks, it is consumed least in breakfast with 16% which is the same with the consumption of fat.

Votes
Average: 6 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 yasamin27 73 view
2020-01-16 Noah1997 78 view
2020-01-15 BIBHU KALITA 11 view
2020-01-13 Võ Phạm Quỳnh Hương 11 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 67 view
Essays by user Munir :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94838709677 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66728747543 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8848954878 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.571428571 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100655470214 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511182336828 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526813507838 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073624204212 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575197533327 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.