The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart explains the number of speed cameras installed in Melbourne roads and corresponding percentage of accidents and death
occurred from the year 2002 to 2005. Although cameras are in place its their sole responsibilities to make sure safety driving and
smoother travel experience.
Firstly for the year 2002, the number of cameras are 30, accidents reaches peak point and decreased to 3% and death rates are
fluctuating and stays at 0.8%. During 2003, The cameras count is 40, can see slight increase in accidents to 3.2% and death rates
are decreasing and remains at 0.6%.
Secondly, In 2004 the cameras installed are 70, Accident and death rates also rise to 3.7% and 1%. This is the first time
the death rates reaches this point. The number of cameras went up to 140 to make sure safety transport but the accidents steadily
increasing and reaches 3.5% which is the largest value. And lastly the death rates reaches to a maximum of 1.8% and sweep decreased to 1.2%.
Overall the death rates reaches a greatest point of 1.5% by end of 2004 and accidents to 3.3% by 2005.
The numbers are increasing throughout the year even though more camera numbers are in place, because of advanced
motor cars and powerful vehicles. I think, The death rates will be decreased if police replaces them
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-10 | Dwarakesh Suresh | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | ravitejacts | 11 | view |
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 81
- Missions to explore space are hugely expensive, and there are problems on Earth which demand attention. The number of these missions needs to be reduced. 56
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 78
- The chart shows the amount of fast foods consumption in Melbourne over period of time. 56
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... to 2005. Although cameras are in place its their sole responsibilities to make sur...
^^^
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bilities to make sure safety driving and smoother travel experience. Firstly f...
^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and decreased to 3% and death rates are fluctuating and stays at 0.8%. During 20...
^^^
Line 10, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ety transport but the accidents steadily increasing and reaches 3.5% which is the...
^^^
Line 13, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
....2%. Overall the death rates reaches a greatest point of 1.5% by end of 2004 a...
^
Line 14, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umbers are in place, because of advanced motor cars and powerful vehicles. I thin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92825112108 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48521943311 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4349301115 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9090909091 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0694235424935 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307461631395 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304172214584 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0299827603526 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347719552715 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.