The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
The given charts compare two years (2004 and 2009) in terms of the proportion of five chief means of transportation of citizens travelling to a particular college.
Generally, it canb be seen clearly that commuting by train was the least favored form of transportation, while there was a change, from car to bus, for the most commonly used form of transport over the five-year period.
Looking at the charts in more detail, in the year 2004, travelling by cars to university was the most popular for students and the percentage of car travelers held the lion’s share of the total used form of transport, with 51%. The second famous one was using bus to commute to college, which made up a third of the entirety five chief methods of transport, with 33%. Three others means of transportation were at the bottom and the figures for pupils riding a bike, going on foot and taking a train were 9%, 4% and 3%, respectively.
Turning to the figure in the year 2009, using automobile and bus still were two most common methods for students, but there was a change. Travelling by bus became the first choice of pupils, which constituted 28% (increased 13% compared to the figure 5 years ago), while going to university by car ranked the second place. The proportion of car users was 28%, which dropped by approximately half in comparison with that of in the year 2004. The percentage of bicycle users rose slightly, which was 16% in 2009. The figures for train travelers and walkers remained almost the same, with 4% and 6%, in turn and were still the least favored forms of transportations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 510, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s rose slightly, which was 16% in 2009. The figures for train travelers and walkers...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75090252708 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7058767198 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516245487365 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5094372016 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.6 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204908113985 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895231325488 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671072081973 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144238577625 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803350042646 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.