The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart represents the mode of transportation of the people travelling to the university for the year 2004 and 2009. The different vehicles people used for transportation were bus, car, bicycle and train. Some preferred walking to the university instead of using a vehicle. Calibration is done in percentage.
Overall in 2004 mostly people preferred to travel by car which accounts to 51%. Bus was the second most used mode of transport to travel accounting to 33%. So, 84% of people travelled through bus and car in 2004. Remaining 16% travelled through train, bicycle or by walking. However in 2009, bus became the most used mode to travel accounting to 46%. Car was used by 28% people. Remaining 26% used bicycle, train or preferred walking.
Hence, by observing the trend in both the years, mostly people prefer to use bus and car as the mode of transport to travel to the university. Some people prefer bicycling. But the least preferred modes were to travel by train or walking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bused', 'bussed'.
Suggestion: bused; bussed
...les people used for transportation were bus, car, bicycle and train. Some preferred...
^^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d through train, bicycle or by walking. However in 2009, bus became the most used mode ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8875739645 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71234497024 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491124260355 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2401004728 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.0 112.824112599 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0714285714 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.09268292683 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157528327812 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696723709991 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662098285619 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131048189461 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414910515445 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.19 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.