The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years.
The given pie charts depict the percentage of holidaymakers of a particular region using different types of housing in three years 1989, 1998 and 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that staying with family and friends in holiday was dominant among four examined types of accommodation. Additionally, the proportions of people who stayed with family and friends and camped decreased, whereas the proportion of those who rented apartments and hotels slightly increased with time.
In 1989, the rate of people staying with family and friends accounted for 52%, while camping was exact a half of that, with 26%. Both these numbers went down with time, and in the next 20 years, 44% of people choosing to stay with family and friends and only 12% camped in holidays.
In contrast, the percentages of holidaymakers renting apartments and hotels increased over the surveyed year period. In 1989, only 7% rented apartments and 15% stayed in the hotels. However, in the year 2008, the figures for both these accommodation types were the same and stood at 22% for each.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-07 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | rika205 | view | |
| 2021-05-13 | gur1040894 | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | qnhisonthwaytoul | 96 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | pris | 74 | view |
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of math graduate and all graduates who got full time job after graduating from a university in Australia and also show the average salary of both these types of grads from 2004 to 2012 67
- The table below gives information the satisfaction rate in a course of first year students 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquires received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 73
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produces 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02840909091 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67027924957 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4671492149 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22622680553 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994969382107 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966832948045 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154855214152 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116983572246 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.