The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.
The given table gives information about the workforce and factories of silk production in two countries, England and Wales, in the period of 50 years from 1851 to 1901.
Overall, it can be seen that silk industry in these two countries employed more female employees than the male ones. Although there was a gradual decrease with time period in the number of total employees, the number of manufacturing silk factories increased over the 50-year period, in spite of the fluctuation.
Looking the figures for the year 1851, the total number of employees reached its peak at 130.750 people, including 53.964 males and 76.786 females. In contrast, the number of factories was the lowest in the year period, at only 272. In the next ten years, while the total number of employees witnessed a fall of over 20.000 people, the number of silk factories almost tripled and peaked at 761.
Regarding the statistic of the next 40 years, there was a significant drop in the number of both males and females, to 13.375 and 25.567, respectively. This also resulted in the decrease in the total number of employees, from 109.869 to 38.942. During 40 years after 1861, the silk industry underwent a fluctuation in the number of the factories, however, it still increased compared to the year 1851.
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produces 78
- The table below gives information the satisfaction rate in a course of first year students 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquires received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 73
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 78
- The table shows the number pf employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, so, still, while, in contrast, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92165898618 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61206189366 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4494620001 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277959912075 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115833539859 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635162875692 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178328330495 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524409923872 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.