The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The amount of male and female employees in different positions in an engineering enterprise within a ten-year period from 2005 to 2015 is depicted vividly in the given chart, the figure being mentioned in percent . Overall, whilst the rate of men working in top positions experienced a downward trend, that of women, on the contrary, were in inverse proportions to its counterpart. It is critical to notice that the rate of female administrators was the highest among all categories and the number of analysts remained static after a decade

Regarding the proportion of male employees in difference job categories, the rate of male managers and vice presidents dropped from roughly 60 and above to 50 in 2015 while the proportions of male directors decreased to 40 .

In contrast, female's proportions witnessed a surge as the number of female vice directors, directors and managers increased from 30, 40 and roughly 40 to 50, 60 and roughly 50 after a decade

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-14 Titi2lope 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t, the figure being mentioned in percent . Overall, whilst the rate of men working...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rtions of male directors decreased to 40 . In contrast, females proportions witn...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04402515723 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97869963542 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.1259978172 43.030603864 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.5 112.824112599 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.75 22.9334400587 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225639046822 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127681609713 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871852703756 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149256125326 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638181014099 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.