The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar charts illustrate how many men and women were employed in five various categories in a particular engineering firm in two years, 2005 and 2015.

Overall, the majority of the women were administrators in both years, whereas there were more male vice presidents and analysts in 2005 than their female counterparts.Notably, both sexes made up an equal proportion of vice presidents and managers in 2015.

Regarding 2005, the men dominated four positions.The administrative department was the only category that was favoured by women more than men.In addition, approximately 90% of the women were administrators, just one in ten men occupied the same position.

Regarding 2015, a difference 20 percent was seen in male and female directors. While 70% of the men were analysts, while females accounted for about 30 percent. Half of both genders were vice presidents and managers.Finally, while 80% of the employees were female administrators, only 20% were men.
.

In summary, males were predominant in four positions( vice president, director, manager and analyst) in 2005, while just two positions were dominated by women in 2015.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Notably
... in 2005 than their female counterparts.Notably, both sexes made up an equal proportion...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth sexes made up an equal proportion of vice presidents and managers in 2015. ...
^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... 2005, the men dominated four positions.The administrative department was the only ...
^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...hat was favoured by women more than men.In addition, approximately 90% of the wome...
^^
Line 8, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...nders were vice presidents and managers.Finally, while 80% of the employees were female...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...male administrators, only 20% were men. . In summary, males were predominant i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, whereas, while, in addition, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45505617978 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32291892864 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2430862845 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.714285714 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141062776236 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813722202057 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469001955091 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881317390946 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350485285113 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.