The charts show the spending of a school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 ( 5 lines, 3 năm)
The pie charts details changes in the money paid for five different categories of an educational institution over 2 decades. Looking from an overall perspective, the spending on other workers’ salaries and resources dropped, whereas these figures for the remaining sector grew.
Teachers’ salaries and insurance accounted for the highest and lowest percentage of budget spent in the first year, at 40% and 2%, respectively. After 10 years, the fraction of expenses used to pay for teaching staff rose by 10%, but then fell slightly to 45% in 2001. The figure for insurance, however, recorded a fourfold increase to 8% in the final year.
Furniture and equipment, and resources such as books started at the same levels of 15% but showed opposite trends afterward. The proportion of expenditure on the former decreased sharply and hitting its lowest point of 5% in 1991, which was followed by growth to under quarter in 10 years later. On the contrary, the latter’s figure leaped at 20% and then finished the whole period at just 9%.
Finally, there was a steady reduction from 28% to 15% in the segment of money spent on wages of other workers.
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries Summarise the information by sele 78
- In many countries the quality of life in large cities is becoming worse What are the causes for this problem What measures do you think should be taken to tackle the problem 89
- Topic Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts show the spending of a school in 1981 1991 and 2001 5 lines 3 n m 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts details changes in the mo...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igures for the remaining sector grew. Teachers’ salaries and insurance account...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, so, then, whereas, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98445595855 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70709397847 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663212435233 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8645714538 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0758137956704 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254289264007 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228571789766 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.035944458269 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249515782052 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.