The charts shows the industry sectors contributors of economy in India and Turkey in 2000
The two pie charts depict the proportion of contributions to the economy in the industry sector for India and Turkey in 2000.
Overall, it can be manifested that agricultural was the highest percentage and finance, business and others were the lowest percentages which contribution in India. However, healthcare and education became the largest contribution while the lowest was made by financial, business and other services in Turkey.
Firstly, in India, agriculture had the highest percentage which was 24% and half of the percentage was the government. Health and education were contributed 17% which was the same as leisure. Trade, utilities and transportation which was 14% continuation. Manufacturer and financial, business and other Service contributed economy which was 8% and 5% respectively. Construction had the lowest percentage which was 3% continuation in India.
Secondly, in Turkey, health and education were the highest percentage contributions economy which was 17% and 1% less had trade, utilities and transportation. Agricultural and leisure became the same contribution which was 14 %. Construction and manufacture contribute 12% and 10 % respectively. Financial, business and other Service were the lowest per cent which was 8% and 1 % more was the government contribute.
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do the disadvantages of the development of society outweigh the advantages 73
- The charts shows the industry sectors contributors of economy in India and Turkey in 2000 67
- the graph below shows the comparison of fish and some different meat in Europe country between 1979 to 2004 73
- In some countries foreign language is taught at primary school Do advantage overweight disadvantages 61
- in many parts of the world children and teenager are committing more crime 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce were the lowest per cent which was 8% and 1 % more was the government contribu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 33.7804878049 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76165803109 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3604443787 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487046632124 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5999180711 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129989788074 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687396990345 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129536621077 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159115273133 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189465325733 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.